“Avoid if possible or if you feel bold, then at least read and edit contract...”
1 Star Review
May 20,2024
By:
'Feedback'
May 20,2024
Branch: Hamilton, 43 Cadzow Street
Services: Lettings (as a Landlord)
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: ML4
Branch: Hamilton, 43 Cadzow Street
Lettings (as a Landlord)
Postcode: ML4
0
people found
this helpful
This is “the” worst company I have dealt with in my life of real estate dealing. It was so terrible that we have decided to never touch them by a barge pole.
They have extremely poor and shady practices. These are also supported by their parent company (Countrywide), whom I found to be even terrible.
Despite all the worst experience, if you try, please do read terms and conditions and strike out boldly where they enforce a payment even when Slater Hogg fares a poor performance. I would strongly advise that you strike the clause out clearly with a time barrier.
We lived in an estate where houses sold in 15 days. Our property was well maintained and about 15 years old. Their own sister company gave us a home report which was undervalued, with Slater Hogg & Howison, Hamilton advising us that this should not affect the market value. The house remained on market for over 3 months. We had 16 viewings when we realised through reliable sources that some of the viewers who seemed to have posed as buyers were not even eligible or interested in a large home. So basically I inferred that these were stooges to reduce the price. When I recognised the issue, the lady at the Hamilton Branch had the audacity to shout at me over phone and even start justifying the low quotes from 2 potential buyers. The manager was even terrible in his behaviour condoning his staff behaviour.
It's never too late to show a bad company and bad behaviours, the door. As soon as I got their boards to be taken out, further bad behaviour began - we were being threatened on phone and letters.
Finally, we handed over the property to another Agency, who got us an independent home report which was 10% higher and we sold the house within 2 weeks of advertisement at 20% higher price than what Slater Hogg and Howison was recognising and offering our property.
The ordeal did not end there with Slater Hogg and Howison trying to send notices to us and even in unsealed letters. Because of my oversight on the contract performance clauses, I had to initially pay the money off to avoid such bullish behaviours.
I then escalated the matter to the property Ombudsman and recovered much of the amount.
As stated before, my advise would be to avoid and if you do engage, read every clause, strike or edit to ensure that you would not pay a single penny of marketing fees or home report costs if they do not get you a certain minimum price within a specified date of transaction or sale.
If possible avoid Slater Hogg!
0
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes