“Unprofessional Properties...”
1 Star Review
Feb 14,2022
By:
'Francesca'
Feb 14,2022
Branch: Derby, 35 Ashbourne Road
Services: Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £1300
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: DE22
Branch: Derby, 35 Ashbourne Road
Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £1300
Postcode: DE22
0
people found
this helpful
I rented two houses consecutively for myself and my three young children from 2018 to 2021, both with Professional Properties (PP).
It was difficult from the outset to organise routine maintenance, including a mouse problem, which I had to sort out myself.
When the landlords wanted to repossess a year later
I found a suitable new house but Professional Properties gave me only two weeks to move out and in to the new house, which meant having to organise the move too quickly to find a reliable removal firm at such short notice and I had to settle for 'a man with a van', not to mention the moving experience becoming very stressful.
The move went badly, with the removers damaging the parquet floor in the living room and hall.
When, much later, we asked for the return of the deposit - minus an amount for the floor damage - the landlords, via PP, wanted to retain my whole deposit to cover a total floor refurb and a range of spurious 'damage' issues, including a substantial and unjustifiable amount for ‘Gardening’.
The landlords would not negotiate and I opted for arbitration via the DPS.
Just before the deadline for submission of my evidence Jane Mason at PP called to get me to withdraw from the process, threatening that if I did not the landlord would sue me and win. She was hectoring, intimidating and behaved in an entirely discourteous, aggressive and unprofessional manner. She wouldn't let me speak, so I'd had to raise my voice to be heard, distressing my children who were nearby. She should never be given a customer-facing role.
The second tenancy followed a similar pattern to the first, with requests for maintenance ignored. At the end of the tenancy I was careful to ensure there was no reason to retain any of my deposit. I was surprised when, on leaving, there were considerable deductions, including once again £60 for 'gardening' and a much larger amount for the replacement of part of the shower screen which had become detatched from the wall and fallen while I was in the bath.
I again opted for arbitration, which I won.
I could not understand why PP allowed the landlord to pursue this claim when I had photographic evidence to the contrary. Could it be that they gambled on a favourable decision for the landlord that would help retain their business?
If you're considering renting via PP, either look elsewhere or be prepared to fight for your tenant's rights - as well as Ms Mason.
0
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes