“I would strongly discourage prospective tenants from using this lettings ......”
1 Star Review
Jun 04,2014
By:
'LeadersTenant'
Jun 04,2014
Branch: London, 9-13 The Facade, Devonshire Road
Services: Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £1000
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: SE5
Branch: London, 9-13 The Facade, Devonshire Road
Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £1000
Postcode: SE5
3
people found
this helpful
I would strongly discourage prospective tenants from using this lettings agent. We have been renting a property through Leaders (Forest Hill Branch) for over a year and almost without exception their response to issues we have raised has been sluggish, parsimonious and disorganised, and the fees they charge for the most trivial tasks are extortionate.
When originally viewing the property we noticed a patch of mould spores on the bedroom wall directly above the bed which we were assured would be painted over before we moved in. This work was not completed until five months after we moved in, and then only after we complained a number of times. They appeared to have no system in place to manage ongoing cases like this as on a number of occasions they replied stating that they believed it had already been fixed.
Following a break-in one Friday afternoon, Leaders' contracted carpenter assured us that a new door would be installed by the following Monday but it took them over two weeks. They refused our request to have a burglar alarm installed.
Upon renewing our tenancy, Leaders informed us that we would be charged a £72 fee to cover their administration costs. While a fee was mentioned in the tenancy contract, this seemed extremely high for such a simple transaction. When I why it was so high I was simply told ¢â‚¬Å“there is quite a lot of administration work regarding a renewal.¢â‚¬Â We contacted our landlord independently who was shocked to hear we were being charged such a high fee for what should be a completely straightforward piece of admin (i.e. photocopy a document, change the dates, send these off to get signatures), as she was also being charged £75 for the same service. When I asked for a breakdown of exactly what administrative tasks were involved to justify this fee they constantly avoided my question by defensively repeating ¢â‚¬Ëœit's in your contract,' as clearly they could think of no moral justification. Eventually we managed to get an answer out of them, and they said the admin involved ¢â‚¬Å“the time it took to prepare the document, negotiations between two parties, the production of the document and the completion of it,¢â‚¬Â i.e. email the landlord and tenants, make some small changes to a pre-existing document and print it out, nothing particularly arduous. When it came to actually renewing our tenancy it was an online form, so they were not even paying for paper and postage. The one positive outcome of this was that completely by accident they realised they had overcharged us (we only owed them £60 in the end), which is completely consistent with their disorganised approach.
More recently we have been trying to get them to fix a broken fan in our bathroom and the extractor above our oven, which is a major cause of the mould in our flat. They have been typically slow and uncommunicative about this. When an engineer was eventually sent round to get a quote for replacing these and reported back to them, Leaders seemed to have completely forgotten about this request and stated that there was never a fan in the bathroom (there is, and it is broken) and that the condensation problem in the flat was our responsibility, and nothing to do with the two broken extractor fans. The problem is ongoing. In addition we complained about our front door knob having broken several months ago during a second attempted break-in, and they have still not fixed this.
Leaders are only interested in conserving their own resources and extracting as much money from tenants as possible while providing as little service as they can get away with. Save yourself a lot of hassle and void them at all costs.
What agent could do to change your mind?
Improve internal communications, follow-up on ongoing cases in a more timely and organised fashion, reduce tenenacy renewal fees.
Attached Filesnbsp;
3
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes