“DO NOT RENT WITH REISS SAMUELS- THEY LEFT US HOMELESS ......”
1 Star Review
Aug 31,2023
By:
'Tegan'
Aug 31,2023
Branch: London, 12 Tiller Road
Services: Lettings (as a Tenant)
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: E14
Branch: London, 12 Tiller Road
Lettings (as a Tenant)
Postcode: E14
2
people found
this helpful
DO NOT RENT WITH REISS SAMUELS- THEY LEFT US HOMELESS IN ORDER TO MAKE MORE MONEY. The managing director was possibly the best example of abhorrent customer service. He is the most unprofessional individual I have ever encountered, and I cannot fathom any of these positive reviews about him, due to what he personally, and Reiss Samuels as a company subjected myself, and multiple other students who were seeking tenancy to.
Our documents for our tenancy has been signed for months, we were preparing to move in before the university term started, and we received a call from the managing director accusing my guarantor of not sending in their documents. Bear in mind that we had signed the tenancy agreement months prior, and we would not have been able to do this without all necessary documents having been sent in. He was very hostile and aggressive over the phone, and this was not this first time. I personally know at least 5 other students whose parents he had spoken to threateningly and in vile tones to over the phone when they called to ask questions about the move in process. In this instance I witnessed it first hand. When my guarantor expressed concern that his personal documents had been lost by the company, he actually hung up on him. He then called back and when asked about his inappropriate and unnecessary tone, and why he hung up the phone, he proceeded to tell us that due to our behaviour he felt he had to cancel the tenancy, rendering us without a house for the upcoming year.
He was very egotistical and I believe the extent of his aggression was due to my guarantor not cowering down and being afraid to question the whereabouts of his documents, making the managing director incredibly defensive and enraged his authority was being queried, which led us to believe he had actually lost the documents and was in the wrong, otherwise there would be no need for him to be so aggressively defensive.
As it turns out, before our contract had even officially been terminated and all of our money returned to us, the house was back on the market for an extra £400 a month. So at this point I'm sure you can imagine what had happened, the company has accused us of not providing them with all the documents, in order to have an excuse to cancel out tenancy so they could put the house back on the market for more money, as we had signed the documents so long ago that our rent which was already (£5250 a month), was low in comparison to what they thought they could get with the current market prices.
However, despite this horror story and the stress it entailed, we managed to find a much nicer house, for over £1000 cheaper a month with JACK BARCLAY ESTATES, who were infinitely more pleasurable to work with, and for what it's worth I couldn't be happier to be rid of any contact with Reiss Samuels and the managing director himself after this whole ordeal!
UPDATE: if this review has not already convinced you to never rent with Reiss Samuels, let me update it in regards to an email I received this evening from the admin manager, in response to my review, stating they have involved a solicitor due to my defamation against their business. The review is an honest and true review of my experience with them, and rather than professionally accepting criticism and striving to do better as a company, they have responded with more threats towards me, which is not the first time I have seen this response from them, so it seems to be a reoccurring theme within the company. It also makes me question whether or not they contact all clients who dare post a negative review, with the threat of suing them, in order to make them remove their post and maintain their reputation as a company. Just like the managing director's aggression over the phone, this feels like another defensive attack, and perhaps if they were more gracious and appropriate in the way they conducted themselves and spoke to their clients, people would not leave such damaging yet honest reviews. And if they had read this review and apologised for the stress they put us through and the disgusting manned in which we were treated, and taken this review as a sign they need to do better, as I would expect of any reputable and professional company, rather than respond with a threat about my defamatory comments, I would be less inclined to update my review and continue to show prospective clients who Reiss Samuels are and how they treat people.
My aim is simply to ensure no other prospective buyers or tenants are subject to the same awful treatment.
2
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes
Firstly the landlord gave three extensions for the guarantor/guarantors to complete the reference process which included filling in application forms and providing documentation. All confirmed in writing. The prospective tenants were well organised no issues there.
On the 3rd March i convinced the landlord to give your guarantor additional time for his paperwork to come through which he agreed to do. This is all confirmed in writing
On the 2nd June Email sent to everyone confirmed that your guarantors deed of guarantee letter had not been received and the landlord confirmed if the deed does not arrive by the 9th June in ( 7 days time ) then the landlord will be contacting you directly Tegan to discuss you paying the last 6 months rent in advance and removing your guarantor. Deed of guarantee letters were emailed out on the 3rd April. This is all confirmed in writing
All the other three guarantors deed of guarantee letters arrived prior to this
On the 3rd June Your guarantor called us accusing us of misplacing the deed of guarantee letter. When your guarantor was asked to provide evidence for example recorded delivery, tracking number this could not be provided as he had sent it via normal post and your guarantor was advised to contact royal mail. Your guarantor still had till the 9th June to send or resend the deed of guarantee letter attached with a copy of his birth certificate or passport.
Your guarantor then said he will not be resending the deed attached with a passport copy or birth certificate as it had been lost in the post and we already had a copy of his passport.
This was the final straw the landlord gave the instruction for the holding deposit to be refunded back on the grounds that your guarantor refused to supply the documentation he required. There was no way forward with this, taking into consideration previous delays with documentation.
The property was remarketed and due to the landlord having only a few houses left in his portfolio of a similar size it was rented for hundreds of pounds more a month. Other tenants that paid the same rental amount agreed with yourselves for similar houses in the same development have already moved in and others are due to move in soon.
Your claiming you were left homeless in order for us to make more money, your comments are defamatory and completely false. If this was said to be true then certain individuals would have not been given three extension dates for the reference process to be completed and your guarantor would most certainly not have been given 7 days to provide the deed of guarantee letter.
Our instructions are crystal clear in writing from the outset and a lot of repetitive emails are sent explaining the same. If a prospective tenant or guarantor fails to follow the procedures in the time frame outlined then most certainly the prospective tenants run the risk of losing the property, we have a business to run this cannot be left open ended for prospective tenants and guarantors to decide to send or not send documentation when they please there is a process to follow.
You say your aim is simply to ensure no other prospective buyers or tenants are subject to the same awful treatment. In reply to that if a prospective tenant wishes to rent a property through us they must follow the processes outlined in the email sent to them prior to a holding deposit being paid and stated on the holding deposit contract prior to the reference process starting, if not its best they don’t move forward with any properties Reiss-Samuels have to offer.
Tegan all your guarantor had to do is send or resend the deed of guarantee letter attached with a copy of the passport or birth certificate within 7 days and there would have been no issue and you would have moved in the property.
We will be writing to you again