“The Letting Game; Company number 07533620Su......”
1 Star Review
Nov 17,2021
By:
'Landlords Son.'
Nov 17,2021
Branch: Bristol, Henleaze House, Harbury Road
Services: Lettings (as a Landlord)
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: BS4
Branch: Bristol, Henleaze House, Harbury Road
Lettings (as a Landlord)
Postcode: BS4
0
people found
this helpful
The Letting Game; Company number 07533620
Summary of issues that happened.
- My Mum is elderly, retired in a foreign country, inexperienced in property letting and may have been taken advantage of.
- They allowed contractors in that actively damaged the property and overpriced for the works. Although they (The Letting Game) “managed” and selected these “Trusted” contractors they (The Letting Game) were not willing to help put any issue right. Stating it happened too long ago. Not like it isn't their responsibility to ensure the property is looked after and occasionally inspected or anything?! They wiped their hands clean.
- They appear to carry out inspections, but some damage appears to go unnoticed. (nolettinggo report dated 12/02/2019, damage is visual in the peripheral of an image but not listed in the report, it appears to have gone unnoticed).
- In our opinion, at times they appeared to be an inexperienced group that shy away from offering any advice or answer questions in a technical or professional capacity. Specifically when it came to the Law surrounding Latent Defects and workmanship. (Limitation Act 1980 & Latent Damage Act 1986).
Context.
My Mum lost her partner (my dad) in 2012 and no longer needed a house so big; she bravely decided to go it alone and retire to Portugal as life is too short. She was after someone to manage the house and have her best interests to heart as she had no experience of the complicated world of property letting. The Letting Game appeared to be exactly what she was after. They were polite and responsive to her early requests. That sadly is the end to the positive experience.
Over the coming years tenants came and went, there were various issues around appropriate vetting of individuals including foreign nationals. For the most part my Mum had a consistent income with a very inconsistent surprise billing for the upkeep of the property from tenant damage and Job creation.
As an example of a surprise bill & poor workmanship without any management by the letting game:
May 2017 – The letting Game say they must replace the ensuite toilet in its entirety. It can't be repaired. They charged my Mum £328.80 for this toilet which subsequently didn't fit, wasn't screwed to the floor or the wall. And the overflow was installed running uphill (see the accompanying photos). Comical really. However due to apparent managerial negligence this went un-noticed by the letting game for years until we took back possession of the property this year in 2021. Although the contractor is selected and “managed” by the letting game they washed their hands of it effectively saying it's my Mum's problem.
Example of property damage.
There is evidence of a considerable flood from an upstairs bedroom which has caused the ceiling to sag in the back room below which requires fully redoing at a cost of nearly £1850.00. It appears likely this is from a fish tank or from watering of plants (maybe legal plants, maybe not?) these are assumptions about how the damage become to be. This damage also went unnoticed until we took back possession of the property. Effectively saying it's my Mum's problem. They are unable to claim for the damage from a deposit as they don't appear to know which tenant could have been responsible.
There are other issues i.e inconsistent gas safety checks. Sudden need for a new cooker because of a hinge that appears fine in our opinion. Sudden need for additional gas ventilation which when unnoticed throughout until 1 week before the property was handed back to us. This is already a bloated review so I will save you some time and not go into too much detail.
Their response wholly polite but of no use; from their email to us. (Without the other emails, maybe this doesn't provide you with much context but take from this as you will).
“Whilst I understand your frustrations, we cannot be held responsible for a third parties' workmanship. Unfortunately, as we no longer manage the property, we have supplied you with the contact details of the contractor who fitted the toilet however it is disappointing that you think we are simply 'washing our hands of it'.
Regarding the water damage to the ceiling, this was not brought to our attention during the tenancy and without further investigating, it would be difficult to know what caused it. I would also think it is highly unlikely to be a result of the tenants but as per my previous correspondence, should you feel it is a result of their negligence, I am happy to propose a deduction from their deposits.”
Lesson/advice.
We gave them a decent, tidy, recently refurbished property. 7 years later they give it back to us damaged far beyond any acceptable wear and tear.
If this could be done again, we would have put more importance on the experience of the company and their staff rather than the cost of their fees. The tenant appears more important than the landlord. Maybe that's just an industry/legislative issue that the tenants are provided with more protection? That is our perception of things.
I felt they pulled the wool over my Mum's eyes a bit, rinsed her from time to time and cashed in monthly. Knowing full well she was in Portugal. What could she do? Other than panic and worry of course.
These are our opinions based on what we have experienced. Any statements made throughout this review can be evidenced.
Maybe this review can be used constructively help The Letting Game to improve in the future.
0
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes