0% sales valuation accuracy
0% sales fee satisfaction
0% lettings valuation accuracy
0% lettings fee satisfaction
Oct 20,2021
Oct 20,2021
2
people found
this helpful
this helpful
I cannot recommend strongly enough that people stay away from the agency. This review comes from the perspective of myself renting a property. I also rent out property via other agencies, so I'm away of property law and conduct.
Please read fully to understand.
Upon initial viewing of the property with Martin, I was very happy to take on the apartment on the verbal agreement that it would be cleaned prior to arrival. Either this did not happen, or the cleaners did an appalling job. Upon arrival the boiler did not function, making for a very unpleasant couple of days until it could be repaired. The fridge freezer very quickly ceased to function (its condition was discussed upon the initial viewing). It should have been obvious to the lettings agent and landlord that this was in need of replacing before my arrival. This was not done.
A few weeks after moving in, the washing machine started having problems. Instead of having it immediately replaced, an insufficient repair job was done. This only delayed the inevitable necessary replacement of the machine, causing further inconvenience and disruption.
The cleaning and arranging of repairs / replacements waisted a vast amount of my time. This was an unacceptable start to a tenancy. Especially considering that, at the end of my tenancy, the apartment was inspected properly, and work was done to meet the expectations of the new tenants. I'm extremely glad to see that this was done. It's a shame I was not provided was the same level of service.
The majority of the time after this poor start to the tenancy was acceptable, and I thank Martin and Dianne for being communicative during this time.
Unfortunately, I have to conclude this review negatively, in regards to the return of my deposit and Conrad Fox's unacceptable conduct and ignorance to the law.
It must be understood that no tenant should, or ever will, be willing to lose any more of their deposit than is required by law. With the lack of an ingoing inventory, signed by the tenants, the landlord / agent is never going to be in a strong position in regards to withholding a portion of the deposit to cover repairs. Even though I had made it perfectly clear I was going to leave any disputes on the matter to the DPS, I was sent and invoice to cover substantial painting and cleaning costs to the apartment post vacating.
The dishonesty from Dianne was completely unacceptable. It was claimed to me that the whole apartment has been redecorated prior to my moving in, which was clearly untrue. It must be mentioned that an undisclosed portion of the £400 in dispute was to cover to cost of cleaning the fridge and oven, which were in a worse state upon entry than when leaving. The dispute did end in my losing of £100 which I think is perfectly acceptable. The thorough report by the DPS adjudicator made it clear that a small contribution was all that could be fair to the costs of renovating an apartment which was quite obviously in need of it anyway. I hope this experience has been a good lesson learned by Conrad Fox on deposit law.
Please read fully to understand.
Upon initial viewing of the property with Martin, I was very happy to take on the apartment on the verbal agreement that it would be cleaned prior to arrival. Either this did not happen, or the cleaners did an appalling job. Upon arrival the boiler did not function, making for a very unpleasant couple of days until it could be repaired. The fridge freezer very quickly ceased to function (its condition was discussed upon the initial viewing). It should have been obvious to the lettings agent and landlord that this was in need of replacing before my arrival. This was not done.
A few weeks after moving in, the washing machine started having problems. Instead of having it immediately replaced, an insufficient repair job was done. This only delayed the inevitable necessary replacement of the machine, causing further inconvenience and disruption.
The cleaning and arranging of repairs / replacements waisted a vast amount of my time. This was an unacceptable start to a tenancy. Especially considering that, at the end of my tenancy, the apartment was inspected properly, and work was done to meet the expectations of the new tenants. I'm extremely glad to see that this was done. It's a shame I was not provided was the same level of service.
The majority of the time after this poor start to the tenancy was acceptable, and I thank Martin and Dianne for being communicative during this time.
Unfortunately, I have to conclude this review negatively, in regards to the return of my deposit and Conrad Fox's unacceptable conduct and ignorance to the law.
It must be understood that no tenant should, or ever will, be willing to lose any more of their deposit than is required by law. With the lack of an ingoing inventory, signed by the tenants, the landlord / agent is never going to be in a strong position in regards to withholding a portion of the deposit to cover repairs. Even though I had made it perfectly clear I was going to leave any disputes on the matter to the DPS, I was sent and invoice to cover substantial painting and cleaning costs to the apartment post vacating.
The dishonesty from Dianne was completely unacceptable. It was claimed to me that the whole apartment has been redecorated prior to my moving in, which was clearly untrue. It must be mentioned that an undisclosed portion of the £400 in dispute was to cover to cost of cleaning the fridge and oven, which were in a worse state upon entry than when leaving. The dispute did end in my losing of £100 which I think is perfectly acceptable. The thorough report by the DPS adjudicator made it clear that a small contribution was all that could be fair to the costs of renovating an apartment which was quite obviously in need of it anyway. I hope this experience has been a good lesson learned by Conrad Fox on deposit law.
Was this helpful?
Yes
Yes
Agent Response / Add a Comment
You can use this form to reply to the above review or a displayed comment on the above review.
Browse popular links for estate agents, letting agents and properties nearby
Latest Reviews
17th Sep 2024
reviewed by 'Neil Smither'
2nd Feb 2023
reviewed by 'Daisy'
20th Oct 2021
reviewed by 'Alexander Hill-Knight'
30th Apr 2014
reviewed by 'Patsy'
Opening Hours
Address
Conrad Fox
10 Westow Street
Crystal Palace,London
Greater London
SE19 3AH
Performance statistics
| Services | Valuation Accuracy | Fees Satisfaction | Min Price of property reviewed | Max Price of property reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 0% | 0% | £0 | £0 |
| Lettings | 0% | 0% | £1,300 | £7,250 |
Review statistics
| From Landlords | From Tenants | From Vendors | From Buyers | Other | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Areas covered
Services offered
- Sales
- Lettings
- Block Management
- Surveys
- Conveyancing
- Mortgage Advice
- Home Builder
Advertise on
Members of
Rankings
Overall
Overall
Latest Properties
No Properties
Sep 17,2024
Sep 17,2024
3
people found
this helpful
this helpful
Why is the director Lynn Smither using her maiden name? She has been married to AArt Jan Timmer for over 30 years, oh and he is the companies biggest landlord with Yellow Brick developments valued at £9,500,000 with his wife Lynn Yvette Timmer a former director all ...
read full review
read full review
Was this helpful?
Yes
Yes
Feb 02,2023
Feb 02,2023
1
people found
this helpful
this helpful
Diane Morgan is the worst letting agent ever in my history with agent / totally rude - disloyal and not efficient
She hung up the phone twice - she was not transparent not gave feedback regarding the property we wanted to view / even after going back ...
read full review
read full review
Was this helpful?
Yes
Yes
Oct 20,2021
Oct 20,2021
2
people found
this helpful
this helpful
I cannot recommend strongly enough that people stay away from the agency. This review comes from the perspective of myself renting a property. I also rent out property via other agencies, so I'm away of property law and conduct.
Please read fully to understand.
Upon ...
read full review
read full review
Was this helpful?
Yes
Yes
Feb 28,2018
Feb 28,2018
1
people found
this helpful
this helpful
Extremely shady organisation. Refused to provide invoices for the extortionate cleaning fees and other surprise charges we received when leaving the property....
read full review
read full review
Comment on agent fees
Bad
Was this helpful?
Yes
Yes
Apr 30,2014
Apr 30,2014
1
people found
this helpful
this helpful
My flat was shared-ownership and I felt that Conrad Fox treated me with as much respect as if I had been selling a £1m property. I had to buy extra lease on my flat before I could sell it, and the staff at CF helped ...
read full review
read full review
Was this helpful?
Yes
Yes
No fees information available
Kindly note that legally, letting agents need to publish information about their tenancy fees, government-approved redress schemes and client money protection schemes on their website and on third party websites (on which agents are listed). For properties to lease/rent in England, agents need to keep this information up to date and precise on allAgents or specify within the property description.
Complaints Procedure
No procedure available.
