“This is not a personal attack...”
1 Star Review
Mar 15,2021
By:
'Murteza Ali Alsafar'
Mar 15,2021
Branch: Derby, 17a High Street
Services: Lettings (Prospective customer)
Rent PCM: £600
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: DE21
Branch: Derby, 17a High Street
Lettings (Prospective customer)
Rent PCM: £600
Postcode: DE21
0
people found
this helpful
This is not a personal attack
On a personal level, I would like to apologise to them had I offended them, but I was upset, again the phone calls are recorded, I did not use any foul language in my argument, but I did come across quite frustrated as anyone in my position would have been.
Just a bit of background as to why we are left feeling upset as we were essentially robbed for our holding deposit (which they deny).
Me and my partner had successfully passed the affordability check aspect of the application, we both have a combined income of £40,000 + per annum and a reasonable amount of savings for two people who are both under the age of 25.
Unfortunately we had failed the second stage of the application process, which was the credit referencing check when it turned out I had a CCJ on my record. One that I was completely oblivious to, but as it turns out It apparently has been on my record since October 2016 so coming up to 5 years ago. In that time, I have lived my life as any human being would do, pulled out mobile phone contracts, car finance, buy now pay later schemes, store cards etc, without this ever being flagged. I've also been the main tenancy holder on two properties with two leading letting agents in Derby. Hence my confusion when this was flagged up by let alliance.
Upset as any other person would be, we responded to Leanna who was dealing with our letting agreement via email highlighting that we had no knowledge of this issue and tried explaining this to her over the phone, but again, I was accused with providing misleading information, despite making it very clear that i had no knowledge of this being on my record.
Again she and her colleague Hollie who repeated the same things Leanne was saying to me, refused to come to an understanding and every time I would explain my points they would repeat the same thing, "sorry you've signed the agreement... you should've read the policy before carrying out the credit check... etc". Very cold responses.
I then asked if I could get my refund for my holding deposit of £138 which again I was denied this because we failed the credit checks and therefore they will not continue our application any further. Startled, I informed her that this means that they are rejecting our application and we should be entitled to our money back. Again, she repeated the same cold responses she had memorised to steal our money. I then spoke to Hollie the office manager trying to see if we could come to some agreement, whereby we could at least get half our money back, but again we were also denied even a 1% of our money back.
I have contacted the Association of Residential Agents (UK) about this issue and hopefully they will be responding back in due course.
0
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes
Thank you for your feedback.
We understand your frustration with the results of the credit check portion of your application. If you feel as though the issues with your credit history are unfounded or that you have been mislead by a creditor or financial institution, this is an issue which you should immediately raise with the creditor in question, your bank or the financial authorities. As I am sure you are aware, Hannells Estate Agents have no authority over your credit history or tenancy acceptance in these regards.
In regards to holding fee and Hannells Lettings refusal to refund, I would like to point your attention to Page One, Section One, Paragraph One of the very basic Tenant Terms and Conditions which was ticked, signed and dated by both yourself and your tenancy application partner upon application on 8/3/21, which extremely clearly states;
"In order to proceed with a property, you will be required to pay a Holding Fee. This is equivalent to one weeks rent and if your application is successful will be offset against your first month’s rent as agreed in the Offer Form. However, if your application does not progress due to you providing misleading information, failing Right to Rent checks, withdrawing from the property or failing to take reasonable steps to enter into the tenancy as per these terms and conditions, then the holding fee is non-refundable. The fee does not constitute an offer of a tenancy agreement between yourselves and the agency but is proof of your intentions."
Tenancy applications are not always successful for a multitude of reasons. It is never the most pleasant conversation for any of Hannells staff members, and no Letting Agent has any kind of "flexibility" when it comes to acceptance or refusal, especially when the refusal is a result of financial checks. We make it extremely clear in all terms and conditions that this is the case so tenants can apply for rental property in confidence. I am sure this is the reason that the conversations you had with staff members as a result felt obstinate, as there is very little we can do in this regard.
As stated, the holding fee is non-refundable for any failure of tenancy application. Your lack of prior knowledge for the reasoning behind the tenancy application failure have no bearing on this policy. A tenancy application is always made on the basis that the prospective tenant is creditworthy, and although allegedly unbeknownst to you at the time of application, in reality this was not the case.
We wish you the best with your property search in the future, and should you successfully correct the issues raised with your personal record during this application, we would be happy to assist you in the future.