You can use this form to reply to the above review or a displayed comment on the above review.
iam-sold Ltd
6th Floor, Arden House, Regent Centre
Newcastle upon Tyne
Tyne and Wear
NE3 3LU
0845 519 3126
Services | Valuation Accuracy | Fees Satisfaction | Min Price of property reviewed | Max Price of property reviewed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sales | 88% | 72% | £40,000 | £2,147,483,647 |
From Landlords | From Tenants | From Vendors | From Buyers | Other | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 4 | 26 | 15 | 25 | 18 |
No Properties
Great service !
Abi was excellent, very helpful and always kept me updated
...Beware nobody telling you, before viewing the property.
Not sure if this is ethical or even legal as there's no clear instruction for buyers as if you don't come to an agreement to purchase it with the auction, you as a buyer ...
1) You say the Reservation Agreement is between the Seller and the Buyer. Yet you claim sole right to adjudicate (enforce" is not the right word – you're not the police and have no right to enforce anything) on whether obligations have been met, and retain (and use) the right to threaten to end the process, keeping the fees?
2) My assertion that you add no value is supported by this admission – any Buyer and Seller could use this contract without you just as effectively as with you. You also do not address the point (in fact you fundamentally misunderstood this point – please read this more carefully) that the fee would achieve its purpose as a deposit rather than a fee. As I said, never have I paid so much for so little.
3) You ignored my point that the 2 agreements do not agree – what's the point of been given a generic agreement prior to bidding if you're then presented with a different one after the bid is accepted? You also didn't acknowledge my point that even the agreement that was supposed to be specific to my case was not amended to reflect agreed terms – you refused point blank to do this, leaving all parties relying on emails and verbal agreements.
4) My experience is that the Sales Progression Team is anything but ‘dedicated'. I had to chase them ahead of deadlines, and they only noticed days afterwards that deadlines had passed.
5) The ‘exceptional' negotiation skills you refer to mostly consist entirely of making threats to cancel the process and put the property back on the market. This is not negotiation, and you do it in such a rude way you're not even bothering to dress it up as such.
6) If you had pride in your ‘excellent' customer service, you would respond positively to this feedback, rather than publishing a message in public contradicting and refuting the points I've made. It doesn't come across like you're interested in improving – it comes across that you're more interested in aggressively defending a ridiculous business model than constructively addressing buyers' concerns.
7) Buyers do not come to you – sellers do. This is a disingenuous statement. What might be more accurate is that your customers are the sellers – you act in their interest by leveraging the threat of ending the process to bump the traditional players into acting quickly on partial, ambiguous and contradictory information. The conceit of this is that in my case you failed to do this – as the process was late due to other parties you were unable or unwilling to work with effectively.
I should add that since moving into my property that I've learnt that documents I received as part of this process had the wrong address on them, something your team didn't notice. This was one of the things I pointed out at the time and was assured wouldn't be a problem. It was. I would advise you focus on getting the basics right rather than posting further disingenuous messages on review websites.