“Curiosity brought me back to Sarah Kenny website. What a ......”
1 Star Review
May 21,2016
By:
'A.'
May 21,2016
Branch: Bristol, 30 Regent Street
Services: Lettings (Prospective customer)
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: BS6
Branch: Bristol, 30 Regent Street
Lettings (Prospective customer)
Postcode: BS6
2
people found
this helpful
Curiosity brought me back to Sarah Kenny website. What a pleasant surprise it is to see that the flat (REDRD124) for which I applied nearly a month ago is still on market. Now, I can't help but wonder whether the agents are interested in letting the property at all or for whatever shady considerations they are just buying time; since time, as the saying goes, is money.
There are only two positive things to be said about the agency: one is the floor plans, which is a very useful extra, and the other being the well-organised viewing procedure.
Everything else, in my experience, was a complete disaster.
And so, I applied for the property the next day making an offer no sensible landlord would refuse (i.e., to pay half a year of rent plus the deposit upfront, not to mention the excessive tenant fee, more of the latter in a bit). The agents made me wait ONE WEEK before giving a dismissive answer. Unconvincing as it sounds, the excuse I kept hearing went along the lines of sorry, we haven't heard back from the landlord yet.
Now to the heart of the matter: the EXCESSIVE TENANCY FEE.
I'm not saying Sarah Kenny is the only agent in England that plays dirty, but for a business that has been around for 25 years such tactics seem particularly indecent. But then, what sort of expectations should anyone have from a Tory-oriented Sunday Times winner.
I come from Scotland where it's illegal for a letting agency to charge a tenant any fees ('premiums') except for a deposit/holding fee. And this, I claim, is for a very good reason.
Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 all letting agents in England and Wales are required to display a full list of fees and charges. And indeed, one can find clear pricing lists on the website.
Let me briefly demonstrate now how our acclaimed agent charges tenants for... well, apparently for nothing:
1. Undertaking references (tenant pays) vs. Obtaining references (landlord pays)
2. Drawing up the documentation of your lease (tenant) vs. Drawing up the tenancy agreement (landlord) ['lease' and ‘tenancy agreement' are synonymous, folks]
3. Registering the deposit (tenant) vs. Registration of tenants deposits (landlord)
4. Undertaking the check in, including a full inventory & meter readings (tenant) vs. [1] Transfer of utilities and council tax [2] Meeting tenants at check in to go through inventory (landlord)
5. Registering you with all relevant utilities companies (tenant) vs. Transfer of utilities and council tax (landlord)
In short, the tenants are required to pay for the 'services' that the landlord has already paid for. Doubling the profit, isn't it nice?
They [the letting agents] also must not charge you for: anything they also charge the landlord for. (http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/private_renting/costs_of_renting/letting_agent_fees_and_charges)
I invite the directors of the company, Mr. Allen and Mrs. McKelvey, to have the courtesy and come up with some sort of justification by replying to this post. I believe there are other people eager for an explanation. After all, 50% of the monthly rent routinely stolen from the clients' pockets is no laughing matter.
What agent could do to change your mind?
Bad.
Attached Filesnbsp;
Comment on agent fees
Bad.
2
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes