“GOOD:+ Found us a place to live quickly+ Got our ......”
1 Star Review
Oct 02,2014
By:
'UnhappyTenant'
Oct 02,2014
Branch: London, 104 Cromer Street
Services: Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £2080
Would you recommend?: No
Postcode: NW1
Branch: London, 104 Cromer Street
Lettings (as a Tenant)
Rent PCM: £2080
Postcode: NW1
22
people found
this helpful
GOOD:
+ Found us a place to live quickly
+ Got our deposit back in full
+ Found us a relatively cheap property for the area
BAD:
- communication very poor, with emails ignored and phone calls never returned - particularly maintenance dept.
- fees extremely high for service delivered
- state of accommodation upon moving in frankly shocking
- repairs performed extremely late, if at all, and usually poorly
- not enough enforcement of landlord's adherence to tenancy agreement
As an overall summary, I would say that Allen Goldstein (AG) is the worst estate agency I have encountered - though as a caveat I have only been a tenant with two - with standards that fell well below my expectations of not only a premium estate agent service (which I assume it is, as we were charged around £500 each in fees, compared to £80 at the other agency) but of any professional company. The house was in a state of disrepair and filth when we moved in, communications were regularly ignored or waved aside, and some of the employees were downright rude - on one occasion I was even lied to. On at least three occasions, the landlord appeared at the house without giving 24 hours' notice; I realise this may be his fault and not AG's, but they ought to enforce the tenancy agreement. On the positive side, our first contact (when they wanted our money) was efficient, and after a minor disagreement over cleaning which was quickly resolved, we got our deposit back in full and swiftly, and the accounts manager in charge of this was always polite and quick to respond.
Our very first impressions when we walked in the door on day one looking for accommodation in Camden were positive: we were greeted by the branch manager warmly and promptly, and within a week we had been given a range of possible properties, although only one was within our price range (this because we had chosen a relatively expensive area in which to live and we didn't have a great deal of money). We were able to view this property only a few days later.
I myself lived in a different city at the time, and beyond one weekend in which I and another future tenant went round estate agents, I wasn't part of the process in person. This was left to the tenant who lived in London. I mention this because if I had been the one to look at the flat, there is no way I would have accepted it without some serious promises in writing to improve the place. It was extremely dirty (there was actually a bucket of vomit in the bathroom), had a broken window, and full of assorted junk such as an engine, a plant sprayer, and lots of dirty linen. My housemate was assured verbally that this would be sorted before we were to move in to the property. None of it was.
So, I was unpleasantly surprised when I moved in to find the flat in a practically unlivable state. In addition to the problems my housemate had spotted during the viewing, we also found that there were missing curtains, an extremely stained and dirty bathroom, and the boiler did not work. There was hot water available only by turning on the electric-powered emergency heater, and no central heating. There was no gas safety certificate (a legal requirement), no information on utility providers so that we could take over payment, and the front door of the flat did not lock. The sealant around the bath was full of holes, and water was therefore leaking into the flat downstairs; the man who lived there informed us that this had been happening for months and had not been resolved.
I contacted the maintenance department at AG by email the same day to let them know about these problems. Three days later, we received an email in reply and organised that someone would come round at 7pm that same day. They did not show up. It took a few weeks for some of these problems to be fixed (chiefly the door and window, and removal of some of the junk) but many remained unresolved. We spent the entire time having to use the emergency boiler, turning it on for half an hour if we wanted to use hot water, and without central heating. Luckily, the flat was poorly insulated and surrounded by flats inhabited by elderly people, so we did not get cold. With regards to the cleaning, we were assured that as the flat had been filthy when we moved in, we would not need to clean before moving out.
This story of slow response to problems when raised, slow fixing of problems, and some problems never being resolved persisted. When the cold water supply broke and we had no cold water in the bathroom and toilet, I tried for weeks to get the estate agent and landlord to fix it, and in the end had to resort to threatening to pay for a plumber ourselves and taking it out of the rent. This was then fixed rather promptly. However, other problems, such as the bathroom light breaking, and the washing machine breaking, did not ever get fixed, and so we were without these for at least four months (until the end of the tenancy). On occasions where problems were resolved, such as the tiling in the bathroom that fell off when I leant on it, they were often resolved poorly - in the case of the tiling, large quantities of cement and sealant were left stuck to the bath, along with a number of unsightly stains. In the end, after multiple emails ignored and my phone calls to the maintenance department being rebuffed with "He's not in; he'll call you back" (which he never did), we had decided to be resigned to the broken things in the house and just live with them.
Another inefficiency of AG became apparent to me, although it did not affect me directly, towards the end of the tenancy. I was informed by email that a prospective tenant wanted to view the flat in the next few days; would anyone be in during the day? I replied that as all of us worked, nobody would be in during the day, so AG would have to let themselves in - and could I be given an exact time when they were coming? I wasn't, until an email came through two days later at 10 am saying that there would be a viewing at 10.30, but they had discovered they did not possess a copy of the keys, and therefore would anyone be in? I replied that no, we were all at work. I did not then hear anything more about visits, and so I assume that the prospective tenants were rightly put off by an estate agent that is so inefficient it doesn't realise it doesn't have a copy of the keys until half an hour before the viewing.
As the time for us to move out approached, I visited the branch to discuss ending the tenancy, and what we would need to do to ensure our deposit was returned. The branch manager - the same man who had been our first point of contact - did apologise about the lack of fixing problems (and offered to talk to maintenance, but as he'd done so before and nothing had happened I told him not to bother) and assured me that due to the issues with the flat, we would not be held responsible for broken appliances and cleaning - all they wanted was proof we'd settled all our utility accounts, and they'd release the deposit.
So, after we moved out, I emailed him this proof - and got no response. I tried calling a few times and asking to speak to him, but I was told each time he was not in the office that day, or in the office but out of it at present, and he would call me back. He did not. Eventually I was told that if I wanted to get the deposit, we needed to speak to head of accounts. When I emailed her, I told her that we'd given the manager all the proof - and she told me he was on holiday. This was the exact same day I'd been told by someone else on the phone that he was in that day, but out at present. Either they were so hopeless they couldn't keep track of their own employees, or someone was lying to me. I had to resend the emails with proof to the accounts manager, who duly accepted them, and a couple of days later I was told that we would have our deposit repaid - minus a charge for cleaning of £119.99. I was rather annoyed by this, and so I explained the situation and included the email I'd sent right at the beginning detailing the state of the flat. The cleaning charge was instantly waived - which makes me think that really they knew we shouldn't pay and were just trying their luck - and we got our deposit back.
I must say, however, that the accounts manager was always polite and helpful, and we went from initial contact to the deposit arriving in my account within a week, so I have no complaints about her. I suggest she go and work for another company.
In conclusion, I found almost all my dealings with AG to be thoroughly frustrating, and as a company to be expensive and inefficient, some members of staff excluded. It may be the case that many of these issues are also the fault of the landlord, but I believe that the role of an estate agency is to keep both tenants and landlords in line, so some culpability for that must sit with AG. I would heartily discourage anyone from renting through AG, and indeed when I have seen people looking at properties advertised in their window, have given an overview of the poor service available and thus hopefully prevented some customers from having the experience we did.
22
people found
this helpful
Was this helpful?
Yes
We will ensure no tenant ever has the experience that you have had going forward. Please could you email me you contact details as I am unable to locate you through the limited details on the All Agents site. I would appreciate a brief chat to see if there is anything we could do to compensate.
Warmest Regards